TK Health Report 2025

TK Health Report 2025

What does the TK Health Report 2025 say — and what does it mean for employers?

Note: refers to German law. TK's 2024 sick-leave report shows a 5.23% sick leave rate and 19.1 absence days per employee. Age-adjusted mental health disorders rose 159% (2006–2024). For employers: psychosocial risk assessment (Sec. 5 ArbSchG), reintegration management (Sec. 167 SGB IX), and tax-free workplace health promotion (Sec. 3 No. 34 EStG).

TK Sick Leave Report 2024: Key Findings and BGM Implications

Report FindingWhat It Means for EmployersBGM Measure
Sick leave rate 2024: 5.23% (prior year: 5.31%)Slight decline, but structurally high levelSystematic workplace health management (BGM) for sustainable reduction
Avg. 19.1 absence days per employee, 2024Continued wage payment costs: avg. ~€2,865 per employee/year (at €150/day)Workplace health promotion measures under Sec. 20 SGB V — eligible for statutory health insurance funding
Mental health disorders: +4.2% vs. 2023Most common single cause of long-term sick leavePsychosocial risk assessment (Sec. 5 ArbSchG) + stress management course (Sec. 20 SGB V)
Long-term trend: mental health disorders +159% (2006→2024, age-adjusted)Structural increase — not a temporary trendPermanent BGM system, not one-off actions
Climate change: 60% of employees feel effects in the workplaceNew sources of strain — heat protection, psychological resiliencePsychosocial risk assessment update for climate risks (2025 special topic report)

What the TK 2024 sick-leave report really shows — beyond the headline

Note: This section refers to German statutory health insurance data and German law. The TK Health Report is published annually and is based on billing data from around 5 million TK-insured employees in Germany. That makes it the largest health-insurer-specific dataset in the country. It shows not just how sick employees are, but why.

The sick leave rate fell in 2024 from 5.31% to 5.23% — a marginal decline after the record year 2023. Structurally, the level remains high. 19.1 absence days per employee means each employee is out, on average, for nearly 4 weeks per year.

What makes TK's 2025 special topic report distinctive: for the first time, it systematically analyzes the link between climate change and workplace health. 60% of employees report that climate change is affecting their workplace. 93.2% consider a healthy workplace an important attractiveness factor — making BGM an employer-branding topic as well.

What employers must concretely take from the TK report

Three statutory obligations under German law are directly addressed by the TK data:

First: Psychosocial risk assessment (Sec. 5 ArbSchG). The long-term rise in mental health disorders (+159% age-adjusted) is a structural finding — not an opinion. Under German law, employers are required to identify and assess psychosocial hazards and derive measures. If the assessment is missing: fines of up to €30,000 (Sec. 25 ArbSchG).

Second: Reintegration management / BEM (Sec. 167 SGB IX). At 19.1 absence days per employee, the 42-day BEM threshold is regularly exceeded. Employers who fail to initiate BEM risk having subsequent dismissals ruled invalid (Federal Labor Court ruling BAG 7 AZR 698/14).

Third: Tax-free workplace health promotion (Sec. 3 No. 34 EStG). Up to €600 per employee per year can be spent tax-free on certified workplace health promotion measures. Stress and relaxation courses, exercise programs, nutrition counseling — all eligible for funding under Sec. 20 SGB V and tax-deductible.

  • Conduct the psychosocial risk assessment and repeat every 3–5 years (immediately upon significant changes)
  • Monitor BEM deadlines daily — 42 days triggers a mandatory invitation to the reintegration process
  • Use the full BGF budget of up to €600 per employee/year — a tax-free benefit
  • Enrich the BGM report with TK data — makes the case for action visible to leadership
  • Add climate risks to the psychosocial risk assessment (heat, extreme weather events, psychological strain)

TK Health Report and BGM compliance: what's mandatory vs. what's optional

Note: refers to German law. The TK report itself creates no legal obligations — it's an informational document. What is mandatory are the laws its data illustrates. The distinction matters:

Mandatory (not optional): psychosocial risk assessment (Sec. 5 and Sec. 25 ArbSchG), reintegration management / BEM (Sec. 167 SGB IX), occupational safety committee (Sec. 11 ASiG). These obligations exist regardless of sick leave rates or company size.

Optional — but with strong ROI: workplace health promotion measures (Sec. 20 SGB V), tax-free BGM benefit allowance (Sec. 3 No. 34 EStG), statutory health insurance subsidies for courses (Sec. 20b SGB V). "Optional" here doesn't mean "unimportant" — it means "no fine for not doing it." According to IGA Report 40, the median ROI of workplace health promotion is 1:2.7.

Practical recommendation: cite the TK report in your annual BGM report. It's a recognized secondary data source — leadership, works councils, and health insurers accept it as a basis for investment decisions.

Related measures & topics

Key takeaways

  • Note: figures and legal references relate to Germany. Sick leave rate 2024: 5.23% (TK) — a slight decline after the record year 2023 (5.31%), but structurally high
  • 19.1 absence days per employee in 2024 — equivalent to avg. ~€2,865 in continued wage payments per employee/year
  • Mental health disorders up 159% age-adjusted since 2006 — psychosocial risk assessment and reintegration management are no longer optional
  • 60% of employees feel the effects of climate change in the workplace — add climate risks to the psychosocial risk assessment
  • Use the TK report as an external data source in leadership BGM reporting — strengthens the case for investment

Frequently asked questions

How often is the TK Health Report published?+

Annually, usually in spring. The report always analyzes the prior year: the TK 2025 sick-leave report is based on 2024 sick-leave data. Additional special topic reports are also published — in 2025, for example, on climate change and health. Publisher: Techniker Krankenkasse (TK), available free as a PDF.

Does the TK report only apply to companies with TK-insured employees?+

No. The TK Health Report is cross-industry and structurally representative of the German workforce — even though it formally reflects only TK-insured members. All major German health insurer reports (TK, DAK, AOK, BARMER) show similar trends. Companies with a different insurer mix can apply the findings.

What's the difference between the TK Health Report and the DAK Psych Report?+

The TK Health Report is a full report covering all causes of sick leave — mental health, physical illness, respiratory conditions, injuries. The DAK Psych Report focuses exclusively on mental health disorders. Both are useful for BGM arguments: TK for the overall picture, DAK for the mental-health agenda specifically.

Can I use the TK Health Report in my BGM report to leadership?+

Yes — and it's recommended. The TK report is a recognized, scientifically grounded secondary source. Leadership reports become more persuasive when external data (TK sick leave figures + IGA ROI) is combined with internal metrics (your own sick leave rate, BEM rates, risk assessment status). This builds a case for action without placing internal blame.

Turn TK report compliance into action, directly

Psychosocial risk assessment, BEM deadlines, and BGF documentation in one system — EasyBGM handles what the TK report identifies as mandatory.

Sources

Last updated: 2026-06-27. Not legal or tax advice — have your specific case reviewed by a professional.

Read more

BGM-Kompass covers German workplace health management (BGM): funding paths, figures and legal references (e.g. § 20b SGB V, § 3 No. 34 EStG, § 167 SGB IX, the statutory-health-insurer prevention guidelines) apply to Germany.